Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 25
Filtrar
1.
Int J Mol Med ; 46(1): 3-16, 2020 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2225841

RESUMEN

In the current context of the pandemic triggered by SARS-COV-2, the immunization of the population through vaccination is recognized as a public health priority. In the case of SARS­COV­2, the genetic sequencing was done quickly, in one month. Since then, worldwide research has focused on obtaining a vaccine. This has a major economic impact because new technological platforms and advanced genetic engineering procedures are required to obtain a COVID­19 vaccine. The most difficult scientific challenge for this future vaccine obtained in the laboratory is the proof of clinical safety and efficacy. The biggest challenge of manufacturing is the construction and validation of production platforms capable of making the vaccine on a large scale.


Asunto(s)
Betacoronavirus/inmunología , Infecciones por Coronavirus/prevención & control , Pandemias/prevención & control , Neumonía Viral/prevención & control , Vacunas Virales , COVID-19 , Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , Infecciones por Coronavirus/clasificación , Infecciones por Coronavirus/epidemiología , Infecciones por Coronavirus/terapia , Composición de Medicamentos/métodos , Composición de Medicamentos/normas , Composición de Medicamentos/tendencias , Desarrollo de Medicamentos/métodos , Desarrollo de Medicamentos/normas , Desarrollo de Medicamentos/tendencias , Humanos , Seguridad del Paciente , Neumonía Viral/epidemiología , Neumonía Viral/terapia , SARS-CoV-2 , Resultado del Tratamiento , Vacunación/efectos adversos , Potencia de la Vacuna , Vacunas Virales/clasificación , Vacunas Virales/normas , Vacunas Virales/provisión & distribución , Vacunas Virales/uso terapéutico
5.
J Infect Dis ; 221(11): 1752-1756, 2020 05 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1109241

RESUMEN

Controlled human challenge trials of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine candidates could accelerate the testing and potential rollout of efficacious vaccines. By replacing conventional phase 3 testing of vaccine candidates, such trials may subtract many months from the licensure process, making efficacious vaccines available more quickly. Obviously, challenging volunteers with this live virus risks inducing severe disease and possibly even death. However, we argue that such studies, by accelerating vaccine evaluation, could reduce the global burden of coronavirus-related mortality and morbidity. Volunteers in such studies could autonomously authorize the risks to themselves, and their net risk could be acceptable if participants comprise healthy young adults, who are at relatively low risk of serious disease following natural infection, if they have a high baseline risk of natural infection, and if during the trial they receive frequent monitoring and, following any infection, the best available care.


Asunto(s)
Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto/normas , Infecciones por Coronavirus/prevención & control , Desarrollo de Medicamentos/tendencias , Pandemias/prevención & control , Neumonía Viral/prevención & control , Vacunas Virales/normas , Betacoronavirus/inmunología , COVID-19 , Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , Humanos , Concesión de Licencias , SARS-CoV-2
17.
Vaccine ; 38(39): 6184-6189, 2020 09 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-701883

RESUMEN

Inactivated viral vaccines have long been used in humans for diseases of global health threat and are now among the vaccines for COVID-19 under development. The Brighton Collaboration Viral Vector Vaccines Safety Working Group (V3SWG) has prepared a standardized template to describe the key considerations for the benefit-risk assessment of inactivated viral vaccines. This will help key stakeholders to assess potential safety issues and understand the benefit-risk of the vaccine platform. The standardized and structured assessment provided by the template would also help to contribute to improved communication and support public acceptance of licensed inactivated viral vaccines.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Coronavirus/prevención & control , Aprobación de Drogas/legislación & jurisprudencia , Pandemias/prevención & control , Neumonía Viral/prevención & control , Medición de Riesgo , Vacunas Virales/normas , Betacoronavirus/efectos de los fármacos , Betacoronavirus/inmunología , Betacoronavirus/patogenicidad , COVID-19 , Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , Defensa Civil , Infecciones por Coronavirus/epidemiología , Infecciones por Coronavirus/inmunología , Infecciones por Coronavirus/virología , Regulación Gubernamental , Humanos , Inmunogenicidad Vacunal , Cooperación Internacional , Seguridad del Paciente , Neumonía Viral/epidemiología , Neumonía Viral/inmunología , Neumonía Viral/virología , SARS-CoV-2 , Vacunas de Productos Inactivados , Vacunas Virales/administración & dosificación , Vacunas Virales/biosíntesis
20.
Am J Prev Med ; 59(4): 493-503, 2020 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-645862

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Given the continuing COVID-19 pandemic and much of the U.S. implementing social distancing owing to the lack of alternatives, there has been a push to develop a vaccine to eliminate the need for social distancing. METHODS: In 2020, the team developed a computational model of the U.S. simulating the spread of COVID-19 coronavirus and vaccination. RESULTS: Simulation experiments revealed that to prevent an epidemic (reduce the peak by >99%), the vaccine efficacy has to be at least 60% when vaccination coverage is 100% (reproduction number=2.5-3.5). This vaccine efficacy threshold rises to 70% when coverage drops to 75% and up to 80% when coverage drops to 60% when reproduction number is 2.5, rising to 80% when coverage drops to 75% when the reproduction number is 3.5. To extinguish an ongoing epidemic, the vaccine efficacy has to be at least 60% when coverage is 100% and at least 80% when coverage drops to 75% to reduce the peak by 85%-86%, 61%-62%, and 32% when vaccination occurs after 5%, 15%, and 30% of the population, respectively, have already been exposed to COVID-19 coronavirus. A vaccine with an efficacy between 60% and 80% could still obviate the need for other measures under certain circumstances such as much higher, and in some cases, potentially unachievable, vaccination coverages. CONCLUSIONS: This study found that the vaccine has to have an efficacy of at least 70% to prevent an epidemic and of at least 80% to largely extinguish an epidemic without any other measures (e.g., social distancing).


Asunto(s)
Control de Enfermedades Transmisibles , Simulación por Computador , Infecciones por Coronavirus , Pandemias , Neumonía Viral , Vacunación , Vacunas Virales/farmacología , Betacoronavirus/aislamiento & purificación , COVID-19 , Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , Control de Enfermedades Transmisibles/métodos , Control de Enfermedades Transmisibles/estadística & datos numéricos , Infecciones por Coronavirus/epidemiología , Infecciones por Coronavirus/prevención & control , Erradicación de la Enfermedad/métodos , Erradicación de la Enfermedad/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Evaluación de Necesidades , Pandemias/prevención & control , Neumonía Viral/epidemiología , Neumonía Viral/prevención & control , SARS-CoV-2 , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Vacunación/métodos , Vacunación/estadística & datos numéricos , Cobertura de Vacunación , Vacunas Virales/normas
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA